Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D and 2GB VRAM Tesla M1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (62W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla M1060 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Tesla M1060 +29%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2011
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
188W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GT200B
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy