NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+824%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
DG2-128
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
