NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
+1025%
5.468 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
16
256
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
