Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (45W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 +49%
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK107
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy