Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +3124%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
80
256
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GV100
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy