Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +516%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
2688
56
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.650 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
26.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
638.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
53.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GK110
N12E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy