Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (38W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 +79%
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
192
Shading Units
256
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

38W
TDP
142W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF100
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy