Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +4560%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

38W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP102
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy