NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
5568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+548%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
1344
Shading Units
6912
112
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
