NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
6560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+1823%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
320bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
11
SM Count
108
352
Shading Units
6912
44
TMUs
432
40
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
640 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
152W
TDP
400W
450 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA100
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
