Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 500M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 500M
0.269 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +4011%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N12M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
8 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy