Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 500M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 500M
0.269 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +683%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1344
16
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
GK104
N12M-Q3
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy