Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 500M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
13984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 500M
0.269 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +17695%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
14080
16
TMUs
880
4
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N12M-Q3
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy