Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 500M and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 500M
0.269 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +2869%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
26
96
Shading Units
3328
16
TMUs
104
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
GA106
N12M-Q3
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
12 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy