Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 500M and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 500M
0.269 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +5725%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
80
96
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
GV100
N12M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy