NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 226W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5010M
+79%
0.691 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Apr 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
128
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
226W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
G92
N12E-Q5
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
