NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5010M
+2557%
0.691 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
G86
N12E-Q5
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
