Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 7000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 163.4GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 7000
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +58%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
851 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
163.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
1344
64
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
108W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy