Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB +3291%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro CX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1297 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
80
192
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
24
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy