Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
GRID K280Q +3779%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK104
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy