Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB +26459%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
80
32
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GV100
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy