Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
14048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +48253%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
14080
16
TMUs
880
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
153 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy