Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
19392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +92740%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
19456
32
TMUs
880
12
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
MI300
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
146 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy