Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q +3914%
7.066 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
40
64
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
12
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
220.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.13 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.066 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
220.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
TU104
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy