NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
+8030%
14.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
46
64
Shading Units
5888
32
TMUs
184
12
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
59W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G94
GPU Name
GA104
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
