Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
5056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +7928%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
64
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
12
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GV100
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

59W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy