Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
14240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +15330%
44.44 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
14336
48
TMUs
896
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
450W
-
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
100 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net