NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
GRID K280Q
+694%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2009
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GK104
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
