Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-III
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
7680
24
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
13.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G71
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
90 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.278 billion
Transistors
8 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy