NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+33119%
8.637 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1215 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GA107
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
