Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M +4329%
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
576
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy