Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 78W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000 +161%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

78W
TDP
51W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK107
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy