Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M +145%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
35.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GM108
NB9E-GLM3
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
Unknown
324 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy