Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +4688%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
1344
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GK104
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

28W
TDP
108W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy