Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
13296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +102763%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
208
16
Shading Units
13312
8
TMUs
832
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

28W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy