Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q +6440%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

34W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy