Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +5002%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

34W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy