NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock3230MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (322.3GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50
+75500%
26.46 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2025
Quadro FX
Generation
Navi IV
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2220 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3230 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
322.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.7 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
413.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.92 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.46 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
826.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
Navi 44
-
GPU Variant
Navi 44 XT
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
Unknown
144 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
