Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800 +589%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

108W
TDP
42W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G84
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy