Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200 +149%
1.151 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM107
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy