Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +2633%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
3840
64
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP102
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy