NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
6896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+29453%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
108
16
Shading Units
6912
8
TMUs
432
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
46.98 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GA100
N10M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
