NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+16991%
8.033 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
46.98 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GP104
N10M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
