NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+17459%
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
46.98 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GA107S
N10M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
Unknown
57 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
