NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
+100%
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
24
96
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GT200B
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
