NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
6560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+9739%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
6656
24
TMUs
416
24
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
Aldebaran
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
