Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 226W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +3626%
14.31 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
46
128
Shading Units
5888
64
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

226W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA104
G92-880-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net