Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +2906%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
108
192
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
24
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
400W
450 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy