Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 189W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800 +34%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
189W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy