Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M +45%
0.673 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
837 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy